| Metric | Chaty | Google Maps | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 13 | 48 | Google Maps |
| Accessibility | 83 | 84 | Google Maps |
| Best Practices | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 93 | Google Maps |
| Security | 56 | 73 | Google Maps |
| TTFB | 1854ms | 821ms | Google Maps |
| Composite | 70 | 77 | Google Maps |
Google Maps outperforms Chaty in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 70). Chaty leads in no categories.
Chaty doesn't clearly lead Google Maps in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Chaty sites and 48 audited Google Maps sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback