| Metric | Chaty | Premio Chaty | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 13 | 13 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 83 | 83 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 56 | 56 | Tie |
| TTFB | 1854ms | 1854ms | Tie |
| Composite | 70 | 70 | Tie |
Chaty and Premio Chaty are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Chaty has a composite score of 70 while Premio Chaty scores 70.
Chaty doesn't clearly lead Premio Chaty in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Premio Chaty doesn't clearly lead Chaty in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Chaty sites and 1 audited Premio Chaty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback