Skip to content

Chosen vs Lunr.js

Based on 8 and 2 real audits

View Chosen details | View Lunr.js details
MetricChosenLunr.jsWinner
Performance4558Lunr.js
Accessibility8185Lunr.js
Best Practices8696Lunr.js
SEO9184Chosen
Security6875Lunr.js
TTFB419ms388msLunr.js
Composite7475Lunr.js
Performance
Chosen
45
Lunr.js
58
Accessibility
Chosen
81
Lunr.js
85
Security
Chosen
68
Lunr.js
75
SEO
Chosen
91
Lunr.js
84
Composite
Chosen
74
Lunr.js
75

Lunr.js outperforms Chosen in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Chosen leads in SEO.

When to choose Chosen

Choose Chosen when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lunr.js

Choose Lunr.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 8 audited Chosen sites and 2 audited Lunr.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Chosen or Lunr.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Lunr.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Chosen or Lunr.js?
Lunr.js sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Chosen or Lunr.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Lunr.js (85 vs 81). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Chosen or Lunr.js?
Chosen sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Chosen or Lunr.js?
Lunr.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (388 ms vs 419 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Chosen or Lunr.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Lunr.js scores higher on overall composite score while Chosen may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback