Based on 1 and 2145 real audits
| Metric | ChurnZero | Cloudflare | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 25 | 49 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 86 | 88 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 77 | 86 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 85 | 89 | Cloudflare |
| Security | 62 | 68 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 212ms | 298ms | ChurnZero |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms ChurnZero in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). ChurnZero leads in TTFB.
Choose ChurnZero when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited ChurnZero sites and 2145 audited Cloudflare sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback