Skip to content

CivicPlus vs Font Awesome

Based on 1 and 730 real audits

View CivicPlus details | View Font Awesome details
MetricCivicPlusFont AwesomeWinner
Performance2346Font Awesome
Accessibility8587Font Awesome
Best Practices7789Font Awesome
SEO8391Font Awesome
Security7868CivicPlus
TTFB789ms486msFont Awesome
Composite7875CivicPlus
Performance
CivicPlus
23
Font Awesome
46
Accessibility
CivicPlus
85
Font Awesome
87
Security
CivicPlus
78
Font Awesome
68
SEO
CivicPlus
83
Font Awesome
91
Composite
CivicPlus
78
Font Awesome
75

Font Awesome outperforms CivicPlus in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 78). CivicPlus leads in security, composite score.

When to choose CivicPlus

Choose CivicPlus when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited CivicPlus sites and 730 audited Font Awesome sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, CivicPlus or Font Awesome?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 23 on average).
Which has better security, CivicPlus or Font Awesome?
CivicPlus sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, CivicPlus or Font Awesome?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, CivicPlus or Font Awesome?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), CivicPlus or Font Awesome?
Font Awesome sites show lower Time to First Byte (486 ms vs 789 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose CivicPlus or Font Awesome for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while CivicPlus may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback