Based on 4 and 66 real audits
| Metric | Clearbit Reveal | Netlify | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 61 | Netlify |
| Accessibility | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 78 | 93 | Netlify |
| SEO | 88 | 95 | Netlify |
| Security | 67 | 68 | Netlify |
| TTFB | 335ms | 327ms | Netlify |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Netlify |
Netlify outperforms Clearbit Reveal in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Clearbit Reveal leads in no categories.
Clearbit Reveal doesn't clearly lead Netlify in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Netlify when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Clearbit Reveal sites and 66 audited Netlify sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback