| Metric | Clearpay | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 37 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 97 | 88 | Clearpay |
| Best Practices | 96 | 86 | Clearpay |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Clearpay |
| Security | 82 | 68 | Clearpay |
| TTFB | 293ms | 483ms | Clearpay |
| Composite | 80 | 74 | Clearpay |
Clearpay outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). core-js leads in performance.
Choose Clearpay when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Clearpay sites and 2041 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback