Skip to content

ClickDimensions vs core-js

Based on 1 and 1599 real audits

View ClickDimensions details | View core-js details
MetricClickDimensionscore-jsWinner
Performance2536core-js
Accessibility8488core-js
Best Practices7784core-js
SEO9291ClickDimensions
Security6165core-js
TTFB113ms379msClickDimensions
Composite6872core-js
Performance
ClickDimensions
25
core-js
36
Accessibility
ClickDimensions
84
core-js
88
Security
ClickDimensions
61
core-js
65
SEO
ClickDimensions
92
core-js
91
Composite
ClickDimensions
68
core-js
72

core-js outperforms ClickDimensions in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 68). ClickDimensions leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose ClickDimensions

Choose ClickDimensions when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited ClickDimensions sites and 1599 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ClickDimensions or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, ClickDimensions or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ClickDimensions or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ClickDimensions or core-js?
ClickDimensions sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ClickDimensions or core-js?
ClickDimensions sites show lower Time to First Byte (113 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ClickDimensions or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while ClickDimensions may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback