| Metric | ClickGUARD | Vidazoo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 25 | 25 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 73 | 73 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 79 | 79 | Tie |
| TTFB | 129ms | 129ms | Tie |
| Composite | 77 | 77 | Tie |
ClickGUARD and Vidazoo are closely matched, each leading in different categories. ClickGUARD has a composite score of 77 while Vidazoo scores 77.
ClickGUARD doesn't clearly lead Vidazoo in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Vidazoo doesn't clearly lead ClickGUARD in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited ClickGUARD sites and 1 audited Vidazoo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback