Based on 474 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare Bot Management | Makeswift | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 22 | Cloudflare Bot Management |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Makeswift |
| Best Practices | 84 | 96 | Makeswift |
| SEO | 88 | 61 | Cloudflare Bot Management |
| Security | 69 | 71 | Makeswift |
| TTFB | 228ms | 695ms | Cloudflare Bot Management |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Makeswift |
Makeswift outperforms Cloudflare Bot Management in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Cloudflare Bot Management leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Cloudflare Bot Management when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Makeswift when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 474 audited Cloudflare Bot Management sites and 1 audited Makeswift sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback