Based on 2491 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Endurance Page Cache | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 74 | Endurance Page Cache |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Endurance Page Cache |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | Endurance Page Cache |
| Security | 70 | 60 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 319ms | 1023ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms Endurance Page Cache in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Endurance Page Cache leads in performance, best practices, SEO.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Endurance Page Cache when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2491 audited Cloudflare sites and 1 audited Endurance Page Cache sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback