Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Erlang

Based on 2102 and 10 real audits

View Cloudflare details | View Erlang details
MetricCloudflareErlangWinner
Performance4967Erlang
Accessibility8892Erlang
Best Practices86100Erlang
SEO8987Cloudflare
Security6880Erlang
TTFB296ms1194msCloudflare
Composite7483Erlang
Performance
Cloudflare
49
Erlang
67
Accessibility
Cloudflare
88
Erlang
92
Security
Cloudflare
68
Erlang
80
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Erlang
87
Composite
Cloudflare
74
Erlang
83

Erlang outperforms Cloudflare in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 74). Cloudflare leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Erlang

Choose Erlang when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2102 audited Cloudflare sites and 10 audited Erlang sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Erlang?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Erlang sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (67 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Erlang?
Erlang sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Erlang?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Erlang (92 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Erlang?
Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Erlang?
Cloudflare sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 1194 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Erlang for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Erlang scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback