Based on 2102 and 6 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | EWWW Image Optimizer | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 53 | EWWW Image Optimizer |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 86 | 79 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | EWWW Image Optimizer |
| Security | 68 | 67 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 296ms | 421ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | EWWW Image Optimizer |
Cloudflare and EWWW Image Optimizer are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Cloudflare has a composite score of 74 while EWWW Image Optimizer scores 76.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose EWWW Image Optimizer when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2102 audited Cloudflare sites and 6 audited EWWW Image Optimizer sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback