Based on 3201 and 33 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Highlight.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 49 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 89 | 84 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 87 | 90 | Highlight.js |
| SEO | 90 | 89 | Cloudflare |
| Security | 73 | 65 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 370ms | 294ms | Highlight.js |
| Composite | 78 | 74 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms Highlight.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Highlight.js leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Highlight.js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3201 audited Cloudflare sites and 33 audited Highlight.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback