Based on 2102 and 12 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Howler.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 40 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | Howler.js |
| Security | 68 | 66 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 296ms | 435ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Cloudflare outperforms Howler.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Howler.js leads in SEO.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Howler.js when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2102 audited Cloudflare sites and 12 audited Howler.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback