Based on 2740 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Kiwi Sizing | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 30 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 88 | 73 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | Cloudflare |
| Security | 72 | 82 | Kiwi Sizing |
| TTFB | 348ms | 965ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 77 | 81 | Kiwi Sizing |
Cloudflare outperforms Kiwi Sizing in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 81). Kiwi Sizing leads in security, composite score.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kiwi Sizing when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2740 audited Cloudflare sites and 1 audited Kiwi Sizing sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback