Skip to content

Cloudflare vs LiteSpeed

Based on 2145 and 59 real audits

View Cloudflare details | View LiteSpeed details
MetricCloudflareLiteSpeedWinner
Performance4956LiteSpeed
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8690LiteSpeed
SEO8992LiteSpeed
Security6873LiteSpeed
TTFB298ms925msCloudflare
Composite7579LiteSpeed
Performance
Cloudflare
49
LiteSpeed
56
Accessibility
Cloudflare
88
LiteSpeed
88
Security
Cloudflare
68
LiteSpeed
73
SEO
Cloudflare
89
LiteSpeed
92
Composite
Cloudflare
75
LiteSpeed
79

LiteSpeed outperforms Cloudflare in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). Cloudflare leads in TTFB.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose LiteSpeed

Choose LiteSpeed when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2145 audited Cloudflare sites and 59 audited LiteSpeed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or LiteSpeed?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, LiteSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or LiteSpeed?
LiteSpeed sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or LiteSpeed?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or LiteSpeed?
LiteSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or LiteSpeed?
Cloudflare sites show lower Time to First Byte (298 ms vs 925 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or LiteSpeed for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. LiteSpeed scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback