Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Lunr.js

Based on 2145 and 2 real audits

View Cloudflare details | View Lunr.js details
MetricCloudflareLunr.jsWinner
Performance4958Lunr.js
Accessibility8885Cloudflare
Best Practices8696Lunr.js
SEO8984Cloudflare
Security6875Lunr.js
TTFB298ms388msCloudflare
Composite7575Tie
Performance
Cloudflare
49
Lunr.js
58
Accessibility
Cloudflare
88
Lunr.js
85
Security
Cloudflare
68
Lunr.js
75
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Lunr.js
84
Composite
Cloudflare
75
Lunr.js
75

Cloudflare and Lunr.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Cloudflare has a composite score of 75 while Lunr.js scores 75.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lunr.js

Choose Lunr.js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2145 audited Cloudflare sites and 2 audited Lunr.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Lunr.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Lunr.js sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Cloudflare sites show lower Time to First Byte (298 ms vs 388 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Lunr.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Lunr.js scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback