Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Lunr.js

Based on 2491 and 2 real audits

View Cloudflare details | View Lunr.js details
MetricCloudflareLunr.jsWinner
Performance5258Lunr.js
Accessibility8985Cloudflare
Best Practices8796Lunr.js
SEO8984Cloudflare
Security7075Lunr.js
TTFB319ms388msCloudflare
Composite7675Cloudflare
Performance
Cloudflare
52
Lunr.js
58
Accessibility
Cloudflare
89
Lunr.js
85
Security
Cloudflare
70
Lunr.js
75
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Lunr.js
84
Composite
Cloudflare
76
Lunr.js
75

Cloudflare outperforms Lunr.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Lunr.js leads in performance, best practices, security.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lunr.js

Choose Lunr.js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2491 audited Cloudflare sites and 2 audited Lunr.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Lunr.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Lunr.js sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Lunr.js?
Cloudflare sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 388 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Lunr.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Lunr.js scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback