Based on 2491 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Makeswift | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 22 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Makeswift |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | Makeswift |
| SEO | 89 | 61 | Cloudflare |
| Security | 70 | 71 | Makeswift |
| TTFB | 319ms | 695ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Cloudflare and Makeswift are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Cloudflare has a composite score of 76 while Makeswift scores 76.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Makeswift when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2491 audited Cloudflare sites and 1 audited Makeswift sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback