| Metric | Cloudflare | Node.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 50 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 89 | 84 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 87 | 88 | Node.js |
| SEO | 89 | 94 | Node.js |
| Security | 70 | 69 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 312ms | 328ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Cloudflare outperforms Node.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Node.js leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Node.js when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2430 audited Cloudflare sites and 47 audited Node.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback