| Metric | Cloudflare | Node.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 49 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 89 | 85 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 88 | 89 | Node.js |
| SEO | 90 | 94 | Node.js |
| Security | 72 | 71 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 358ms | 351ms | Node.js |
| Composite | 77 | 76 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms Node.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 76). Node.js leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Node.js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2825 audited Cloudflare sites and 57 audited Node.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback