Based on 2419 and 12 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Paraglide JS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 66 | Paraglide JS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 95 | Paraglide JS |
| Best Practices | 87 | 95 | Paraglide JS |
| SEO | 89 | 98 | Paraglide JS |
| Security | 70 | 84 | Paraglide JS |
| TTFB | 313ms | 255ms | Paraglide JS |
| Composite | 76 | 85 | Paraglide JS |
Paraglide JS outperforms Cloudflare in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (85 vs 76). Cloudflare leads in no categories.
Cloudflare doesn't clearly lead Paraglide JS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Paraglide JS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2419 audited Cloudflare sites and 12 audited Paraglide JS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback