Based on 1894 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | particles.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 49 | particles.js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 86 | 85 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 270ms | 338ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | particles.js |
Cloudflare and particles.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Cloudflare has a composite score of 74 while particles.js scores 75.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose particles.js when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1894 audited Cloudflare sites and 4 audited particles.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback