Based on 2055 and 62 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | Ruby on Rails | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 52 | Ruby on Rails |
| Accessibility | 88 | 85 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 86 | 91 | Ruby on Rails |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | Ruby on Rails |
| Security | 67 | 68 | Ruby on Rails |
| TTFB | 286ms | 331ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Ruby on Rails |
Ruby on Rails outperforms Cloudflare in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Cloudflare leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Ruby on Rails when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2055 audited Cloudflare sites and 62 audited Ruby on Rails sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback