Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Shareaholic

Based on 2102 and 3 real audits

View Cloudflare details | View Shareaholic details
MetricCloudflareShareaholicWinner
Performance4942Cloudflare
Accessibility8885Cloudflare
Best Practices8680Cloudflare
SEO8987Cloudflare
Security6861Cloudflare
TTFB296ms550msCloudflare
Composite7472Cloudflare
Performance
Cloudflare
49
Shareaholic
42
Accessibility
Cloudflare
88
Shareaholic
85
Security
Cloudflare
68
Shareaholic
61
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Shareaholic
87
Composite
Cloudflare
74
Shareaholic
72

Cloudflare outperforms Shareaholic in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Shareaholic leads in no categories.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Shareaholic

Shareaholic doesn't clearly lead Cloudflare in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2102 audited Cloudflare sites and 3 audited Shareaholic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Shareaholic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Shareaholic?
Cloudflare sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Shareaholic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Shareaholic?
Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Shareaholic?
Cloudflare sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 550 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Shareaholic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Cloudflare scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback