Based on 2145 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | SharpSpring Ads | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 50 | SharpSpring Ads |
| Accessibility | 88 | 79 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 86 | 100 | SharpSpring Ads |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | SharpSpring Ads |
| Security | 68 | 60 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 298ms | 637ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 75 | 66 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms SharpSpring Ads in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 66). SharpSpring Ads leads in performance, best practices, SEO.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose SharpSpring Ads when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2145 audited Cloudflare sites and 1 audited SharpSpring Ads sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback