Based on 2145 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | SkyVerge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 37 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 88 | 84 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 86 | 79 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 89 | 85 | Cloudflare |
| Security | 68 | 62 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 298ms | 306ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 75 | 70 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms SkyVerge in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 70). SkyVerge leads in no categories.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
SkyVerge doesn't clearly lead Cloudflare in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2145 audited Cloudflare sites and 2 audited SkyVerge sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback