Based on 2828 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare | TranslatePress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 30 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 89 | 83 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 88 | 78 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 90 | 86 | Cloudflare |
| Security | 72 | 71 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 358ms | 1249ms | Cloudflare |
| Composite | 77 | 78 | TranslatePress |
Cloudflare outperforms TranslatePress in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 78). TranslatePress leads in composite score.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
TranslatePress doesn't clearly lead Cloudflare in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2828 audited Cloudflare sites and 4 audited TranslatePress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback