Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Turbolinks

Based on 2491 and 1 real audits

MetricCloudflareTurbolinksWinner
Performance5235Cloudflare
Accessibility8956Cloudflare
Best Practices8777Cloudflare
SEO8992Turbolinks
Security7079Turbolinks
TTFB319ms866msCloudflare
Composite7679Turbolinks
Performance
Cloudflare
52
Turbolinks
35
Accessibility
Cloudflare
89
Turbolinks
56
Security
Cloudflare
70
Turbolinks
79
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Turbolinks
92
Composite
Cloudflare
76
Turbolinks
79

Cloudflare outperforms Turbolinks in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 79). Turbolinks leads in SEO, security, composite score.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Turbolinks

Choose Turbolinks when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2491 audited Cloudflare sites and 1 audited Turbolinks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Turbolinks?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks sites score higher on security analysis (79 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Turbolinks?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare (89 vs 56). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Turbolinks?
Cloudflare sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 866 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Turbolinks for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Cloudflare scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback