| Metric | Cloudflare | Umami | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 68 | Umami |
| Accessibility | 89 | 92 | Umami |
| Best Practices | 87 | 95 | Umami |
| SEO | 89 | 95 | Umami |
| Security | 70 | 75 | Umami |
| TTFB | 314ms | 291ms | Umami |
| Composite | 76 | 81 | Umami |
Umami outperforms Cloudflare in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 76). Cloudflare leads in no categories.
Cloudflare doesn't clearly lead Umami in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Umami when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2438 audited Cloudflare sites and 22 audited Umami sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback