Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Umami

Based on 2438 and 22 real audits

MetricCloudflareUmamiWinner
Performance5168Umami
Accessibility8992Umami
Best Practices8795Umami
SEO8995Umami
Security7075Umami
TTFB314ms291msUmami
Composite7681Umami
Performance
Cloudflare
51
Umami
68
Accessibility
Cloudflare
89
Umami
92
Security
Cloudflare
70
Umami
75
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Umami
95
Composite
Cloudflare
76
Umami
81

Umami outperforms Cloudflare in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 76). Cloudflare leads in no categories.

When to choose Cloudflare

Cloudflare doesn't clearly lead Umami in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Umami

Choose Umami when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2438 audited Cloudflare sites and 22 audited Umami sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Umami?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (68 vs 51 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Umami?
Umami sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Umami?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Umami (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Umami?
Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Umami?
Umami sites show lower Time to First Byte (291 ms vs 314 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Umami for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Umami scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback