Skip to content

Cloudflare vs Wurfl

Based on 2102 and 3 real audits

View Cloudflare details | View Wurfl details
MetricCloudflareWurflWinner
Performance4931Cloudflare
Accessibility8879Cloudflare
Best Practices8674Cloudflare
SEO8989Tie
Security6865Cloudflare
TTFB296ms129msWurfl
Composite7470Cloudflare
Performance
Cloudflare
49
Wurfl
31
Accessibility
Cloudflare
88
Wurfl
79
Security
Cloudflare
68
Wurfl
65
SEO
Cloudflare
89
Wurfl
89
Composite
Cloudflare
74
Wurfl
70

Cloudflare outperforms Wurfl in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). Wurfl leads in TTFB.

When to choose Cloudflare

Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Wurfl

Choose Wurfl when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2102 audited Cloudflare sites and 3 audited Wurfl sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare or Wurfl?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare or Wurfl?
Cloudflare sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare or Wurfl?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare (88 vs 79). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare or Wurfl?
Cloudflare sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare or Wurfl?
Wurfl sites show lower Time to First Byte (129 ms vs 296 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare or Wurfl for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Cloudflare scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback