Skip to content

Cloudflare Zaraz vs Facebook

Based on 13 and 1432 real audits

MetricCloudflare ZarazFacebookWinner
Performance4339Cloudflare Zaraz
Accessibility9489Cloudflare Zaraz
Best Practices8685Cloudflare Zaraz
SEO9190Cloudflare Zaraz
Security6867Cloudflare Zaraz
TTFB825ms280msFacebook
Composite7573Cloudflare Zaraz
Performance
Cloudflare Zaraz
43
Facebook
39
Accessibility
Cloudflare Zaraz
94
Facebook
89
Security
Cloudflare Zaraz
68
Facebook
67
SEO
Cloudflare Zaraz
91
Facebook
90
Composite
Cloudflare Zaraz
75
Facebook
73

Cloudflare Zaraz outperforms Facebook in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Facebook leads in TTFB.

When to choose Cloudflare Zaraz

Choose Cloudflare Zaraz when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited Cloudflare Zaraz sites and 1432 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare Zaraz or Facebook?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Cloudflare Zaraz sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (43 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare Zaraz or Facebook?
Cloudflare Zaraz sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare Zaraz or Facebook?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare Zaraz (94 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare Zaraz or Facebook?
Cloudflare Zaraz sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare Zaraz or Facebook?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (280 ms vs 825 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare Zaraz or Facebook for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Cloudflare Zaraz scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare Zaraz may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback