Skip to content

Cloudflare Zaraz vs HTTP/3

Based on 16 and 2065 real audits

View Cloudflare Zaraz details | View HTTP/3 details
MetricCloudflare ZarazHTTP/3Winner
Performance4255HTTP/3
Accessibility9189Cloudflare Zaraz
Best Practices8590HTTP/3
SEO9291Cloudflare Zaraz
Security7173HTTP/3
TTFB743ms379msHTTP/3
Composite7778HTTP/3
Performance
Cloudflare Zaraz
42
HTTP/3
55
Accessibility
Cloudflare Zaraz
91
HTTP/3
89
Security
Cloudflare Zaraz
71
HTTP/3
73
SEO
Cloudflare Zaraz
92
HTTP/3
91
Composite
Cloudflare Zaraz
77
HTTP/3
78

HTTP/3 outperforms Cloudflare Zaraz in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 77). Cloudflare Zaraz leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Cloudflare Zaraz

Choose Cloudflare Zaraz when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 16 audited Cloudflare Zaraz sites and 2065 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudflare Zaraz or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HTTP/3 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (55 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudflare Zaraz or HTTP/3?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 71 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudflare Zaraz or HTTP/3?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudflare Zaraz (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudflare Zaraz or HTTP/3?
Cloudflare Zaraz sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudflare Zaraz or HTTP/3?
HTTP/3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (379 ms vs 743 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudflare Zaraz or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HTTP/3 scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudflare Zaraz may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback