Based on 16 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Cloudflare Zaraz | Optimization Detective | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 55 | Optimization Detective |
| Accessibility | 91 | 94 | Optimization Detective |
| Best Practices | 85 | 81 | Cloudflare Zaraz |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 71 | Tie |
| TTFB | 743ms | 4253ms | Cloudflare Zaraz |
| Composite | 77 | 77 | Tie |
Cloudflare Zaraz and Optimization Detective are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Cloudflare Zaraz has a composite score of 77 while Optimization Detective scores 77.
Choose Cloudflare Zaraz when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Optimization Detective when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 16 audited Cloudflare Zaraz sites and 2 audited Optimization Detective sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback