Skip to content

Cloudinary vs HSTS

Based on 28 and 3096 real audits

View Cloudinary details | View HSTS details
MetricCloudinaryHSTSWinner
Performance4052HSTS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8789HSTS
SEO9092HSTS
Security6873HSTS
TTFB284ms397msCloudinary
Composite7577HSTS
Performance
Cloudinary
40
HSTS
52
Accessibility
Cloudinary
89
HSTS
89
Security
Cloudinary
68
HSTS
73
SEO
Cloudinary
90
HSTS
92
Composite
Cloudinary
75
HSTS
77

HSTS outperforms Cloudinary in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Cloudinary leads in TTFB.

When to choose Cloudinary

Choose Cloudinary when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 28 audited Cloudinary sites and 3096 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudinary or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudinary or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudinary or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Cloudinary (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudinary or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudinary or HSTS?
Cloudinary sites show lower Time to First Byte (284 ms vs 397 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudinary or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudinary may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback