Skip to content

Cloudways vs PHP

Based on 4 and 1215 real audits

MetricCloudwaysPHPWinner
Performance3848PHP
Accessibility8488PHP
Best Practices9788Cloudways
SEO8491PHP
Security7267Cloudways
TTFB723ms473msPHP
Composite7775Cloudways
Performance
Cloudways
38
PHP
48
Accessibility
Cloudways
84
PHP
88
Security
Cloudways
72
PHP
67
SEO
Cloudways
84
PHP
91
Composite
Cloudways
77
PHP
75

PHP outperforms Cloudways in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 77). Cloudways leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose Cloudways

Choose Cloudways when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Cloudways sites and 1215 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudways or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudways or PHP?
Cloudways sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudways or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudways or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudways or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (473 ms vs 723 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudways or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudways may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback