Skip to content

Cloudways vs RSS

Based on 4 and 978 real audits

MetricCloudwaysRSSWinner
Performance3849RSS
Accessibility8488RSS
Best Practices9789Cloudways
SEO8491RSS
Security7267Cloudways
TTFB723ms389msRSS
Composite7775Cloudways
Performance
Cloudways
38
RSS
49
Accessibility
Cloudways
84
RSS
88
Security
Cloudways
72
RSS
67
SEO
Cloudways
84
RSS
91
Composite
Cloudways
77
RSS
75

RSS outperforms Cloudways in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 77). Cloudways leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose Cloudways

Choose Cloudways when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose RSS

Choose RSS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Cloudways sites and 978 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudways or RSS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, RSS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudways or RSS?
Cloudways sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudways or RSS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor RSS (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudways or RSS?
RSS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudways or RSS?
RSS sites show lower Time to First Byte (389 ms vs 723 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudways or RSS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. RSS scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudways may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback