Skip to content

Cloudways vs RSS

Based on 2 and 886 real audits

MetricCloudwaysRSSWinner
Performance5048Cloudways
Accessibility8788RSS
Best Practices9888Cloudways
SEO9291Cloudways
Security6366RSS
TTFB346ms351msCloudways
Composite7375RSS
Performance
Cloudways
50
RSS
48
Accessibility
Cloudways
87
RSS
88
Security
Cloudways
63
RSS
66
SEO
Cloudways
92
RSS
91
Composite
Cloudways
73
RSS
75

Cloudways outperforms RSS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 75). RSS leads in accessibility, security, composite score.

When to choose Cloudways

Choose Cloudways when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose RSS

Choose RSS when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Cloudways sites and 886 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cloudways or RSS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Cloudways sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Cloudways or RSS?
RSS sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cloudways or RSS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor RSS (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cloudways or RSS?
Cloudways sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cloudways or RSS?
Cloudways sites show lower Time to First Byte (346 ms vs 351 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cloudways or RSS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Cloudways scores higher on overall composite score while Cloudways may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback