| Metric | ColorMag | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 36 | ColorMag |
| Accessibility | 82 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 77 | 84 | core-js |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | ColorMag |
| Security | 59 | 65 | core-js |
| TTFB | 384ms | 379ms | core-js |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | ColorMag |
core-js outperforms ColorMag in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). ColorMag leads in performance, SEO, composite score.
Choose ColorMag when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited ColorMag sites and 1599 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback