Skip to content

Concrete CMS vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 2 and 136 real audits

View Concrete CMS details | View Matomo Analytics details
MetricConcrete CMSMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance4752Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices9689Concrete CMS
SEO8490Matomo Analytics
Security7265Concrete CMS
TTFB376ms428msConcrete CMS
Composite7374Matomo Analytics
Performance
Concrete CMS
47
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
Concrete CMS
88
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
Concrete CMS
72
Matomo Analytics
65
SEO
Concrete CMS
84
Matomo Analytics
90
Composite
Concrete CMS
73
Matomo Analytics
74

Concrete CMS and Matomo Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Concrete CMS has a composite score of 73 while Matomo Analytics scores 74.

When to choose Concrete CMS

Choose Concrete CMS when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Concrete CMS sites and 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Concrete CMS or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Concrete CMS or Matomo Analytics?
Concrete CMS sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Concrete CMS or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Concrete CMS (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Concrete CMS or Matomo Analytics?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Concrete CMS or Matomo Analytics?
Concrete CMS sites show lower Time to First Byte (376 ms vs 428 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Concrete CMS or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Concrete CMS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback