Skip to content

Conduit vs Lunr.js

Based on 1 and 2 real audits

View Conduit details | View Lunr.js details
MetricConduitLunr.jsWinner
Performance6158Conduit
Accessibility8485Lunr.js
Best Practices9696Tie
SEO8584Conduit
Security6975Lunr.js
TTFB342ms388msConduit
Composite7475Lunr.js
Performance
Conduit
61
Lunr.js
58
Accessibility
Conduit
84
Lunr.js
85
Security
Conduit
69
Lunr.js
75
SEO
Conduit
85
Lunr.js
84
Composite
Conduit
74
Lunr.js
75

Conduit and Lunr.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Conduit has a composite score of 74 while Lunr.js scores 75.

FAQ

Which is faster, Conduit or Lunr.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Conduit sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (61 vs 58 on average).
Which has better security, Conduit or Lunr.js?
Lunr.js sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 69 on average).
Should I choose Conduit or Lunr.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Conduit scores higher on performance while Conduit may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback