Skip to content

Confiant vs EX.CO

Based on 21 and 9 real audits

View Confiant details | View EX.CO details
MetricConfiantEX.COWinner
Performance3945EX.CO
Accessibility8891EX.CO
Best Practices7976Confiant
SEO9089Confiant
Security6570EX.CO
TTFB382ms462msConfiant
Composite7172EX.CO
Performance
Confiant
39
EX.CO
45
Accessibility
Confiant
88
EX.CO
91
Security
Confiant
65
EX.CO
70
SEO
Confiant
90
EX.CO
89
Composite
Confiant
71
EX.CO
72

EX.CO outperforms Confiant in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Confiant leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Confiant

Choose Confiant when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose EX.CO

Choose EX.CO when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 21 audited Confiant sites and 9 audited EX.CO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Confiant or EX.CO?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, EX.CO sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Confiant or EX.CO?
EX.CO sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Confiant or EX.CO?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor EX.CO (91 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Confiant or EX.CO?
Confiant sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Confiant or EX.CO?
Confiant sites show lower Time to First Byte (382 ms vs 462 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Confiant or EX.CO for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. EX.CO scores higher on overall composite score while Confiant may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback