Based on 32 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Consent Manager | Cowboy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 90 | Cowboy |
| Accessibility | 88 | 79 | Consent Manager |
| Best Practices | 83 | 77 | Consent Manager |
| SEO | 92 | 83 | Consent Manager |
| Security | 66 | 75 | Cowboy |
| TTFB | 316ms | 182ms | Cowboy |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | Cowboy |
Cowboy outperforms Consent Manager in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Consent Manager leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.
Choose Consent Manager when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Cowboy when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 32 audited Consent Manager sites and 1 audited Cowboy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback