Based on 98 and 2430 real audits
| Metric | Contact Form 7 | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 50 | Priority Hints |
| Accessibility | 85 | 91 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 93 | Priority Hints |
| Security | 72 | 73 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 1155ms | 461ms | Priority Hints |
| Composite | 78 | 78 | Tie |
Priority Hints outperforms Contact Form 7 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 78). Contact Form 7 leads in no categories.
Contact Form 7 doesn't clearly lead Priority Hints in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 98 audited Contact Form 7 sites and 2430 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback