| Metric | Contact Form 7 | RSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 48 | RSS |
| Accessibility | 83 | 88 | RSS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | RSS |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 628ms | 339ms | RSS |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
RSS outperforms Contact Form 7 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Contact Form 7 leads in no categories.
Contact Form 7 doesn't clearly lead RSS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose RSS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 39 audited Contact Form 7 sites and 868 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback