Based on 110 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Contact Form 7 | Twenty Eleven | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 64 | Twenty Eleven |
| Accessibility | 85 | 85 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 89 | 96 | Twenty Eleven |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Twenty Eleven |
| Security | 73 | 76 | Twenty Eleven |
| TTFB | 1097ms | 444ms | Twenty Eleven |
| Composite | 78 | 80 | Twenty Eleven |
Twenty Eleven outperforms Contact Form 7 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 78). Contact Form 7 leads in no categories.
Contact Form 7 doesn't clearly lead Twenty Eleven in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Twenty Eleven when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 110 audited Contact Form 7 sites and 1 audited Twenty Eleven sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback