Based on 65 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Contact Form 7 | Typed.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 84 | 85 | Typed.js |
| Best Practices | 90 | 98 | Typed.js |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Typed.js |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 760ms | 1018ms | Contact Form 7 |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Typed.js outperforms Contact Form 7 in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Contact Form 7 leads in TTFB.
Choose Contact Form 7 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Typed.js when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 65 audited Contact Form 7 sites and 2 audited Typed.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback