Skip to content

Contentful vs Request Metrics

Based on 92 and 2 real audits

View Contentful details | View Request Metrics details
MetricContentfulRequest MetricsWinner
Performance3744Request Metrics
Accessibility9086Contentful
Best Practices9084Contentful
SEO9196Request Metrics
Security6760Contentful
TTFB258ms201msRequest Metrics
Composite7473Contentful
Performance
Contentful
37
Request Metrics
44
Accessibility
Contentful
90
Request Metrics
86
Security
Contentful
67
Request Metrics
60
SEO
Contentful
91
Request Metrics
96
Composite
Contentful
74
Request Metrics
73

Contentful outperforms Request Metrics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Request Metrics leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Contentful

Choose Contentful when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Request Metrics

Choose Request Metrics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 92 audited Contentful sites and 2 audited Request Metrics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Contentful or Request Metrics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Request Metrics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Contentful or Request Metrics?
Contentful sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Contentful or Request Metrics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Contentful (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Contentful or Request Metrics?
Request Metrics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Contentful or Request Metrics?
Request Metrics sites show lower Time to First Byte (201 ms vs 258 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Contentful or Request Metrics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Request Metrics scores higher on overall composite score while Contentful may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback