| Metric | Contentful | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 38 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | Contentful |
| Best Practices | 90 | 87 | Contentful |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Contentful |
| TTFB | 259ms | 304ms | Contentful |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Contentful |
Contentful outperforms Webpack in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Webpack leads in no categories.
Choose Contentful when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Webpack doesn't clearly lead Contentful in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 89 audited Contentful sites and 955 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback