Skip to content

Contently vs core-js

Based on 1 and 1599 real audits

View Contently details | View core-js details
MetricContentlycore-jsWinner
Performance3136core-js
Accessibility7688core-js
Best Practices7784core-js
SEO10091Contently
Security7065Contently
TTFB488ms379mscore-js
Composite7472Contently
Performance
Contently
31
core-js
36
Accessibility
Contently
76
core-js
88
Security
Contently
70
core-js
65
SEO
Contently
100
core-js
91
Composite
Contently
74
core-js
72

core-js outperforms Contently in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). Contently leads in SEO, security, composite score.

When to choose Contently

Choose Contently when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Contently sites and 1599 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Contently or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Contently or core-js?
Contently sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Contently or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Contently or core-js?
Contently sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Contently or core-js?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (379 ms vs 488 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Contently or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while Contently may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback