Skip to content

Contently vs Facebook SDK

Based on 1 and 641 real audits

View Contently details | View Facebook SDK details
MetricContentlyFacebook SDKWinner
Performance3132Facebook SDK
Accessibility7688Facebook SDK
Best Practices7779Facebook SDK
SEO10091Contently
Security7064Contently
TTFB488ms395msFacebook SDK
Composite7472Contently
Performance
Contently
31
Facebook SDK
32
Accessibility
Contently
76
Facebook SDK
88
Security
Contently
70
Facebook SDK
64
SEO
Contently
100
Facebook SDK
91
Composite
Contently
74
Facebook SDK
72

Facebook SDK outperforms Contently in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). Contently leads in SEO, security, composite score.

When to choose Contently

Choose Contently when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook SDK

Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Contently sites and 641 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Contently or Facebook SDK?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook SDK sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Contently or Facebook SDK?
Contently sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Contently or Facebook SDK?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook SDK (88 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Contently or Facebook SDK?
Contently sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Contently or Facebook SDK?
Facebook SDK sites show lower Time to First Byte (395 ms vs 488 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Contently or Facebook SDK for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook SDK scores higher on overall composite score while Contently may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback