Skip to content

Contently vs Sumo

Based on 1 and 1 real audits

View Contently details | View Sumo details
MetricContentlySumoWinner
Performance3131Tie
Accessibility7676Tie
Best Practices7777Tie
SEO100100Tie
Security7070Tie
TTFB488ms488msTie
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Contently
31
Sumo
31
Accessibility
Contently
76
Sumo
76
Security
Contently
70
Sumo
70
SEO
Contently
100
Sumo
100
Composite
Contently
74
Sumo
74

Contently and Sumo are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Contently has a composite score of 74 while Sumo scores 74.

When to choose Contently

Contently doesn't clearly lead Sumo in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Sumo

Sumo doesn't clearly lead Contently in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Contently sites and 1 audited Sumo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Contently or Sumo?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Contently sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (31 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Contently or Sumo?
Contently sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Contently or Sumo?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Contently (76 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Contently or Sumo?
Contently sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 100 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Contently or Sumo?
Contently sites show lower Time to First Byte (488 ms vs 488 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Contently or Sumo for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Contently scores higher on overall composite score while Contently may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback